Source mapping
Which systems hold which entities, and which one is authoritative.
Integrations & data migration
We connect Salesforce to the systems the organization already runs, define clear interface contracts, and migrate historical data through a controlled process with full reconciliation.
Data Flow Topology
Every stable integration starts with deciding which system is authoritative for each entity. Everything else — protocol, frequency and tooling — follows from that.
Data Flow Topology
Source systems
Where the data comes from
Contract & control layer
What is governed before entry
Salesforce & consumption
Where data becomes a decision
System types
The connection itself is almost never the hard part. The hard part is deciding who owns each field, what happens when two systems update the same value, and how a failure is detected before users detect it.
Integration patterns
| Pattern | When it fits | Typical example | What to watch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Request–Reply | You need an immediate answer before the process continues | Stock or credit check while creating an order | Direct dependency on target-system availability |
| Fire and Forget | The update matters but does not block the process | Pushing a status update to a reporting system | Needs retry and monitoring |
| Batch Sync | High volume, low sensitivity to freshness | Nightly catalog or pricing sync | Freshness gaps between systems |
| Event-Driven | Several consumers for the same business event | Publishing 'order approved' to multiple systems | Requires schema and event-ordering management |
| Data Virtualization | Viewing data without copying it | Showing billing history from an external system | Performance depends on the external source |
Request–Reply
Fire and Forget
Batch Sync
Event-Driven
Data Virtualization
Data migration
Which systems hold which entities, and which one is authoritative.
Measuring completeness, duplication, irregular formats and missing history.
What is fixed automatically, what needs a business decision and what does not migrate.
Field by field, including transformations and default values.
A unique business key per entity to prevent duplicates on repeat loads.
A full load into a test environment at real volumes.
Count, sum and sample checks against the source.
A formal comparison and an approved gap list.
A planned cutover window with a defined rollback point.
Data-quality metrics that keep running after go-live.
Life after go-live
Integration Operations Loop
Monitoring
Measuring successes, failures and response times per interface.
Alerting
A failure crossing a threshold raises an alert to a named process owner.
Handling & fix
Controlled retry, documented manual correction and root-cause analysis.
Adjustment
Updating the interface contract or the business rule, and recording the change.
↻ The cycle repeats — each round feeds the prioritization of the next
Continue from here
FAQ
Next step
We will map the systems, the sources of truth and the required quality level — and build a plan you can actually deliver.